Anyone who is concerned about collusion and online poker should consider playing games where the nuts usually win such as Omaha HiLo. People can talk and compare with others at the table all they desire and if they don’t have the nuts or a good draw to them then they should be getting out of the pot. If the flop doesn’t hit them, then they are out of your way. However, I suspect most of those in collusion are just like most Omaha HiLo players… they stay too long on hands and draw to 3rd and 4th nuts. So what if they may raise more because one of them may make the best hand? This kind of play is found in most low limit games anyway. My advice based on experience. Play Omaha HiLO on line. Collusion is reduced and there will always be a couple of people betting the river that have no business being there.
Answer 1:
I’m personally not worried about any online cheating, I think there is a better chance of catching people online than in a live game. At the same time, ANY hi-lo game offers more opportunities for collusion than a straight high “limit” game. If you were to play O8 with a partner, you could find numerous situations where you could put the squeeze on somebody, how’s this for a simple example: You are player A and your” partner” is player B. You hold Ah-2s-5s- 9s, and player B holds Kh-Qs-5c-3c. The board on the turn reads 3h-8h- 9h-7s. So the nuts here would be A-2 for low and an A high flush for high. Now player C holds 4h-5s-7c-8h for two pair, a straight draw, and a bad low which is the best hand for high at this point but has an extremely tough call to make, but still may.
What if this happens, player A bets and player B raises with his pair of three’s? Surely the two pair can no longer call, and the partners know that because player A has the key card-the A of hearts. Here’s a simpler one. Player A has nut low on the river, player B has nut flush for high, and player C is squeezed in the middle with second-second. Now on the river it goes bet-raise-call back to the guy with the nut low. If I had the nut low, I’d be worried about getting quarted here with another A-2. If your “partner” tells you he is going high you can re-raise with your A-2 and force the squeezed player C to put in a capped bet on the river!
Answer 2:
High-low split games provide much greater collusive opportunities than high-only games. There are several other specific examples that arise more commonly than the examples Daniel gave (but I don’t want to describe them because I don’t want to give anyone any ideas – I’m even a little uncomfortable that Daniel described the ones he did). While the ability to monitor play is important, I think that the low limits that currently reside online are possibly the greatest deterrent of all too collusive play. Those that feel these limits are worth their time to cheat probably don’t know how to do it very well and will either lose money trying, or will get caught in short order. If the limits keep climbing, however, it will be time to start worrying more.
Answer 3:
I think in the long run, the best way to eliminate cheating is to educate the public on the methods of the cheaters. The vast majority of players are honest, and the more eyes that are looking for cheating, the harder it will be for cheaters to get away with it. I also don’t think that there are any real secrets here. Cheaters in poker are often working in teams; the knowledge gets handed around within their circle, or they independently figure out a method that someone else has already invented.